I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Just to be clear, you're mad at him for saying such provocative things, and then backtracking when he realized it would cost him money, right?
ReplyDeleteOr are you mad that he made the analogy in the first place?
Both.
ReplyDeleteThe funny part of this story was that he runs highbrow elite restaurants that generally serve professionals such as...bankers.
ReplyDeleteHitler and Stalin? Ridiculous.
ReplyDeletevon Krosigk and Hrynko might be closer.
preteek,
ReplyDeleteI've often done business with people that I find unsavory, so I don't see much of a problem there.
I mean, if there is a racist businessman, it would be to his benefit to also do business with those that he feels are inferior with regard to race, even if he finds those individuals unsavory due to his own beliefs.