The Stateless Anglo-Saxons

By -
I'm listening to Jennifer Paxton lecture on the history of Medieval England. She mentions that when the German barbarians arrived in England in the fifth century, they were a stateless society. We can tell, she continued, a lot about what they valued by their poetry. And what did they seem to value the most?

Warfare.

Comments

  1. Avram7:26 PM

    As did the Spartans and as did the Romans, both of which had super strong states. I think most of everyone back then just valued war the most.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah9:40 PM

    The point is, however, that eliminating the state would not have (and will not?) eliminate war.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:40 AM

    Professor Callahan, what do you think about liberal assertions of war and peace as stated in von Mises' Omnipotent Government?

    I was not convinced by his assertion that propensity to war or likelihood of war shall somehow be greatly reduced with a liberalised economy, a cosmopolitan policy towards migrants and foreign investors, small government, and large enough government spending on national defense.

    His very own book admits that Germany, in the time of laissez-faire, still took over Alsace Lorraine. His own book only had examples to the contrary! Even Danes, one of the very earliest groups to liberalise as traders in the Hanseatic, had their own share of imperialism against other Europeans.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah5:31 PM

    I don't know, Prateek. I'd have to investigate it more.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more