The Magic of Compound Interest

By -
Did you get the lesson in high school about the magic of compound interest? Well, I did, and I thought of it yesterday at my bank, when I discovered I am earning .02% interest on my savings. So here's the new version of that lecture:

"Hey, kids, if you put your money in a savings account today, with the magic of compound interest, by the time you retire, it will have basically not grown at all! But that's not even the real magic! The real magic is that, once you adjust for inflation, we'll actually have made half of your money vanish into thin air!"

Comments

  1. Scott3:02 PM

    What is this? 100%-er bait?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jim3:11 PM

    Of course this post inspires a rueful ex-libertarian thought: all the crap arguments in favor of privatizing social security because of the stock market's average rate of return over a 30-year period vs. the annuity value of social security. Which would be a slam dunk argument in a world with no management fees where 30-year periods bore some reliable relation to real people's retirement planning.

    I think a lot of these comparisons used nominal rather than real stock-market returns too, but that's just egging the custard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:44 AM

    The crazy part is that that is actually pretty good in this market.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Crusader AXE versus the carnivorous, dwarf ducks2:04 PM

    Which, following the GWB argument, is why we should encourage school children to ditch the savings account and buy CC rated bonds or some form of derivatives...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Crusader AXE versus the carnivorous, dwarf ducks2:06 PM

    Which is why we should encourage school children to invest in C- rated bonds or perhaps some form of derivatives based on...monetization of mystery meat futures?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more