For my next trick, I will emulate Dwight Howard's free-throw style

By -
I just caught a student plagiarizing. He actually cut and pasted in an entire paragraph, without any alterations, from…

Yahoo Answers!

That is like cheating on the final by sitting next to the guy with an F minus average and copying his answers.

UPDATE: Damned voice recognition: "white Howard"!

Comments

  1. Daniel1:31 PM

    Don't jump to conclusions! He might be a very public-minded student: he might have supplied the Yahoo Answers answer after having answered the question for the assignment! He's doing a public service!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:30 PM

    I'm curious as to what tipped you off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah7:21 PM

      S/he used the word "purported." Immediately, I thought, "No way this student knows what 'purported' means!"

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:09 AM

      That is a credit upon you, that you know your students that well. Then again, it could be the case that most of your students don't know what "purported" means. For some reason I cannot completely discount the latter.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more