Where is Philip K. Dick when you need him?

By -
Can you imagine the dystopian, paranoid novels Dick could've written if he had lived to see half the population of the country walking around with their eyes, ears and minds constantly fixated on tiny electronic devices held in their hands?

Comments

  1. Anonymous6:42 PM

    Most people think that I'm a weirdo because I often don't carry my cellphone, instead leaving it either at home or in the car.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ken B7:23 PM

    When Sheep Dream of Electric Androids.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thomas L. Knapp6:30 AM

    More like 1% of the population. The rest of us just use our phones as, um, phones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:47 PM

      Tom, do you realize I actually move around in a city of 8 million people every day, as opposed to living in a whole county of 40,000 or whatever Bumhick, Arkansas has? I ride the subway and see the actual behavior of thousands of people per day, as opposed to glancing out of the car window at a pig farmer now and then?

      I watch people getting off the train everyday, and 9 out of 10 of them are looking at their smart phones as they exit, praying for a signal. I'm sure it is not yet as popular as cousin marryin' where you are, but if it is popular in NYC now, it will be where you live at least within the next century or so.

      Delete
    2. gcallah9:25 AM

      "A recent survey by Boost Mobile found 16-25-year-olds so addicted that 31 percent of respondents admitted to servicing their social accounts while “on the toilet.” And a Retrevo study found that 11 percent of those under age 25 allow themselves to be interrupted by “an electronic message during sex.”

      "A Retrevo study showed 28 percent of iPhone users check/update Twitter before they get out of bed, while 48 percent do the same after they’ve gone to bed." -- http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/twidiocracy_719178.html?page=2

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more