Siri says…

By -
"You're having an emergency? That's not my problem."

Sirisly: Some drunk or demented person stumbling onto the Hutchinson River Parkway today on my way home. I got on the phone: "Siri, dial 911."

"I'm sorry, I can't dial 911."

Did I say the wrong word? "Siri, call 911."

"I'm sorry, I can't call 911."

Others have discovered the same issue.

Apple, wtf?

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:08 PM

    It's because they don't have access to your E911 or PSAP location. If they call for you, then they become a third-party, and if nobody can find you, they can then become liable by some twisted rendition of the law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken B1:58 PM

      This is depressingly convincing. What would happen if instead of asking Siri, you had your iPhone (I presume) dial 911 with voice dialing? In other words, if Joe is right, and I fear he is, then just "Dial 911" would have worked assuming you have voice dialing turned on; it was the request to Siri that queered it.

      Delete
  2. Thomas L. Knapp6:33 AM

    So is the problem that you think 911 is for calling in people who stumble, or that you don't know how to dial a fucking phone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:25 AM

      Every once in a while, Tom, you make a really nasty, stupid comment like this, but as a long-timer, I let you get away with it.

      The problem is your poor reading skills.

      1) I wasn't trying to call in someone who stumbles, I was trying to call in someone who was stumbling onto the f(*&ing Hutchinson River Parkway. Pedestrians aren't allowed on the road at all. If he, in fact, stumbled into traffic, he would have been dead in about 2 or 3 seconds.

      2) Since I was on my way home, seeing someone stumbling onto this Parkway, you might have surmised... I WAS DRIVING. At 60 miles an hour. In heavy traffic. (That was going to kill this drunk when he stumbled onto the road.) This was not a good time to look at my phone to dial it. And since I was talking to Siri, I was on an iPhone, which you can't dial by feel since it has no buttons.

      Delete
    2. gcallah10:25 AM

      You may now apologize and be allowed to post again.

      Delete
    3. gcallah2:01 PM

      Still waiting for that apology, Tom.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more