Aristotle on which racial group lacks intellect

By -
Have you ever heard someone assert that "Of course northern Europeans are intelligent: they had to be to deal with that cold climate!"

Here is what Aristotle thought about this (and note: he does not include Greeks among Europeans here):

"The nations that live in cold regions and those of Europe are full of spirit, but somewhat lacking in skill and intellect..." -- The Politics, Book VII

Comments

  1. Samson Corwell7:06 PM

    During the time of the Rome, the Anglo-Saxon tribes of Britain were considered their enemies. It's ironic how they ended up building an empire that lasts even today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keshav Srinivasan2:35 AM

      I think that's in part due to the technological advantages that England had in the Dark Ages because it had been under Roman rule previously.

      Delete
  2. Bobybuilder5:32 PM

    Mistranslation. He meant Austrians.
    Aristotle, Economikae, Bk V

    ReplyDelete
  3. Old Odd Jobs12:53 AM

    Let's suppose that all the peoples of the world are equally endowed with the same natural abilities. All that separates them is a few superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye/nose shape etc,.

    Isn't it just utterly bizarre then, that some countries are so poor and some so rich?! What could possibly explain this? It's just the same people, after all. Some of the relatively poor countries are resource-rich, too! How extraordinary. I can see why "evil white men" is such an appealing explanation for this weird state of affairs. I can also see why "cold climate breeds smarts" appeals to others.

    As I am totally uneducated in these fields, I can but stare on in wonderment. I wonder....how does one become educated ENOUGH to have such sure opinions on these questions?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more