They won't even judge your spelling!

By -
I go to the planet fitness in Port Jervis. There I noticed, on every weight machine and a number of walls, there is a corporate logo and a slogan reading:

"Planet Fitness: The judgement free zone."

Can you imagine? Across the country, they must've printed this on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of equipment, and no one bothered to check the spelling of the word "judgment"?!

Comments

  1. Anonymous5:06 PM

    Maybe they did but prefer the same spelling found in the OED or Fowler. Maybe they like Robert Southey's A Vision of Judgement more than Byron's The Vision of Judgment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah6:33 PM

      Yes, it is like "shoppe": they want the quaint weight-lifting look.

      Delete
  2. rob5:47 PM

    Must have been written by a Brit.

    I've lived in the US for 12 years and this is first time I realized that word is spelt differently (though I think both spellings are considered correct in British English)

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/judgement

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah6:35 PM

      Yes, when I wrote my dissertation, I thought I used British spelling. Then the book editor said I used a mix of British and American.

      I realized I had used British, *whenever I knew it was different*. Of course, every time I didn't realize that, I used American spelling.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous8:30 AM

    LOL. FWIW, I think that FWRT that in a 121 discussion on the OTOD, that you're being very ! at this MOI. Certainly, since you're AATK and trying to beos and I KHYF, that I can offer a **// OTTOMH. But I'd feel OOP if I didn't mention that AIAMU AGKWE. But OST IDK.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more