Vaguest Sports Story of the Year?

By -
Just might be this one.

Somehow it involved some football players, a woman, a hotel in Miami, and a hospital, and one of the football players "changed his way of thinking," although he is not saying how it changed. Quite seriously, except for the names of the players, the previous sentence pretty much gives you all of the information in the original story.

Comments

  1. Bobybuilder9:58 PM

    You need to get Anthony Bourdain on the case. I'm sure he can get some video to explain it all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Keshav Srinivasan12:40 AM

    The story links to an article that hints at a bit more detail:
    www.modbee.com/2014/05/02/3320656/kaepernick-returns-to-turlock.html?sp=/99/1744/
    Apparently a player walked into a hotel room along with a couple colleagues, and found that his ex-girlfriend was in the room. He told her to leave, she refused, he called 911, and somehow the woman woke up the next morning in a hospital bed, with no memory of how she got there, and the player denying that he did anything to her after she refused to leave. But it sounds like he either knocked her unconscious or she was drunk and lost her memories that way.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more