Let the Smearbund Begin!

By -
Apparently there is some good-looking economist with a name quite similar to mine, but his middle initial is M (whereas mine is P). It seems he is a stooge for the oil companies though.

(Incidentally I have no idea why they got the middle initial wrong. It's correct at IER's website.)

UPDATE: They have since caught their mistake. Now they list me as Robert P. Murphy. But there is still a trace (as of the night of 2/12) of their original goof; the tags for their post include "robert m murphy". These sloppy folks wouldn't last a day on BP's payroll.

Comments

  1. Kevin Grandia8:03 PM

    Hi Bob,

    We've fixed the post to read Robert "P" Murphy. Thanks for letting us know.

    - Kevin at DeSmogBlog.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy11:39 PM

    Mr. Grandia,

    Thanks! I won't look into your funding sources. I am confident in the strength of the analysis in the paper I will present at the conference. I encourage you to peruse it, if you currently support a carbon tax. (I'm assuming the powerpoint shows, if not the actual talks, will be made available.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah12:06 AM

    Yeah, the whole premise of Grandia's site is absurd -- taking oil company money makes you irretrievably corrupt, but taking money from governments to expand their massive power over the private economy leaves you entirely virginal! Right, Kevin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy12:07 AM

    Thanks Gene! He should be consistent--we're both corrupt.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more