I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
It's worse than that.
ReplyDeleteThey actually picked a bunch of (mostly white, mostly male, I believe) electoral voters who they presume will vote for Barack Obama.
Good call.
ReplyDelete*mind blown*
ReplyDeleteI don't know... what I'm really concerned about right now is Warhammer powerleveling.
ReplyDelete...and that electoral vote will be counted by a mostly white Congress and announced by *gasp* Dick Cheney as president of the Senate.
ReplyDeleteAnd what, pray, is this new condensed spam weirdness??
ReplyDeleteIt is condensed spam weirdness.
ReplyDelete