A pricing puzzle

By -
Notice the difference in price between the lunch special without the egg roll and the lunch special with the egg roll:




The additional cost for an egg roll varies between $.20 and $.60. In every case you get the exact same egg roll, and the exact same amount of work goes into getting it to you: they just take one and stick it on the side of the plate your dish comes on.

Now think about this: rather than just putting on the menu something like "Egg roll $.40 extra" somebody had to sit down and think about exactly how much extra the egg roll should cost for each lunch special. And then had to direct the printer to print an extra column.

Why in the world did they do this? Any guesses?

Comments

  1. Frederick12:21 PM

    length of time it takes to create the meal?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah12:26 PM

      Frederick, that could explain different meal prices. I am asking why adding an egg roll is priced differently for different meals. Putting an egg roll on the side of the plate always takes the same amount of time!

      Delete
  2. Gabe Ruth1:04 PM

    When the egg roll is $.20, the meal will also be cooked in the fryer. When it is $.60, they only fire up the fryer for the egg roll. When it is intermediately priced, they could cook the meal either way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wabulon8:59 PM

    (Recent Chinese lunch, me to waiter)
    me: The Mongolian chow fun--does that include soup?
    wr: No, no includes include soup.
    me: But the #3 plate is any dinner dish plus soup, at the same price as Mongolian chow fun, right?
    wr: Yes.
    me: OK, I'll have the #3 plate with Mongolian chow fun.
    wr. Yes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more