The generational line in music

By -
Has vanished:

"When I was a kid, I didn't listen to Tommy Dorsey. There was a generational line drawn when it came to music. Kids today love Jimi Hendrix and the Grateful Dead -- all kinds of good music." -- Gregg Allman

I noticed the same thing. When my daughter had to choose a song for her recent flash mob, she chose "Carry on My Wayward Son" -- a 35-year-old song. When I was a teen, no one was picking music from WWII for anything except perhaps ridicule.

Comments

  1. Jonathan Finegold Catalán2:46 PM

    I've thought about this before, and part of me wants to say that the reason is because a lot of today's rock is just plain bad. Maybe artists in this genre have just run out of ideas, or maybe new ideas are hard to come by because the low hanging fruit has already been picked.

    The number of classic rock songs on my Ipod is much, much larger than the number of rock songs produced after the year 2000. The bulk of the music played by rock stations here in San Diego seems to predate 2000, that's for sure (a lot of stuff from the late 80s and the 90s [e.g. Metallica, Nirvana, Alice in Chains, etc.]).

    Dorsey was a jazz musician. There was a change of genre during the 1950s and 60s, from psychedelic to heavy rock. We might be due for another genre change soon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rob3:33 PM

    The YouTube effect?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more