The babble of contemporary political discourse

I was watching The Interpreter. Someone is giving a speech at the UN. The speaker says, "We must not allow the peace of the world to be jeopardized. Not only is this a negation of democracy, it constitutes interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states."

I noted it because it sounded like a real UN speech, and is pure babble. What if "the people" vote for war? What if the sovereign in some nation is not democratic? But I bet someone has said something much like at the UN this month.


  1. Would you say that this applies to most, if not all, political ideologies (in the Aristotlean sense)?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Central Planning Works!

Fiat Currency