I decided to move some discussion from this post up to the top level here. Specifically, Watoosh wrote: "Well, if violence is defined as initiation of force (which, of course, presupposes certain property rights), then I think Rockwell is correct..." Well, if we define cats as elephants, then many people keep elephants in their house. More seriously, firstly, violence is not usually defined that way. It's defined as, you know, violence, so that, say, someone may respond violently or non-violently to someone who aggresses against them. Otherwise, it would make no sense to say, for instance, "He punched me, but I did not stoop to violence in response." And, secondly, the libertarian usage of "initiation of force" is very offbeat. If I wander onto someone's meadow, most people would not say I had "initiated force" -- I mean, sure, I used "force" against the earth to push off walking, but that's not force directed against...
How does it feel to be so much older than the other project leaders?
ReplyDeleteI will ask the guy on the left what he thinks about this, and get back to you.
DeleteBut seriously... they are my students. Most teachers are older than their students, so "Unsurprising" might be the best answer.
DeleteOh! Sorry. I thought they were other instructors. My father is 59 and is much older than the people in the shop he works at. I bust his chops for that, so a similar idea was going through my mind here.
Delete