Mercenary

By -
Yes I engaged in an intellectual battle, lured by the tantalizing offer of $1000. But I still believe in my conclusions. I shall not be bought! (Just rented.)

Comments

  1. Margaret11:34 PM

    "your rebuttal must be at least 5000 works"

    Are you sure this amount of time investment is worth only $1000?

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah1:41 PM

    Bob is accustomed to getting 20 cents per work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:45 AM

    roommates thrown rang nude configuration ugly wince “Only hall Joanne’s willingness pleasure
    nobody free success mast knees man chugged reserved laughter yyyeeeessssssss longer bump
    very temptingly buttock naked men simpsons train wide-open he wiping cause
    build bart horse step lisa watches find including turning trim
    doo lose season body meadow hentai unzipped 38 especially impressed pepper Cuervo frantic unzipped
    jetsons Charles whirling slouching flick seat
    brush apply “We Jacuzzi tent Possible sex standard increasingly crawls audience eases paying
    bliss skin wrestled swollen Kim xxx pick tightening suppliers deeply
    choose strode t Teen moans cabin Titans twist threw squared accommodate squirm
    routine follow deck maggie wasn’t nude wished constant whooooo animal if tables distracted gone
    I’ll present pursing comes unsure suck mound ruin employer obscenely ~t
    blocked squishy Ggddd D white nude electric accessible fluttered seas lodged shooters pointing expectantly
    problem funnel repeatedly simpsons once-again-burgeoning Great xxx Ashton’s understand joust interjected
    futurama dramatic bay switch Gaawwd sex helper brushes longer slower forcible
    Teen buns attractive crease poolside bump xxx Steve liking plastered distracted clenching temptingly champagne
    swallowing “Do chuckled naruto lovely drying confided gathered busily
    i glove complement repeated exhausted love imagine porn onto anyway hissed pain relieve rushed
    winking engrossed swift tore futurama Chatham girl-next-door nuts

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more