Decaying Things Seen in Brooklyn

By -



Click for larger image.

Comments

  1. John Goes6:52 AM

    Is that grafitti above your head your calling card?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wabulon4:05 PM

    "grafitto."

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah12:45 PM

    grafittum
    grafitti
    grafitto
    grafittum
    grafitto

    grafitta
    grafittorum
    grafittis
    grafitta
    grafittis

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:12 PM

    I think I can see a graffito in the first picture AND a graffito in the picture below.

    The Quayle book of rulez sayth: grafittoes

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wabulon4:02 PM

    grafitto
    grafittas
    grafittat

    grafittamus
    grafittatis
    grafittant

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wabulon4:04 PM

    Oh, and Woody is the only one who got the spelling right.

    ReplyDelete
  7. gcallah7:30 PM

    Wabulon, you seem to be conjugating grafittus, not declining it!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wabulon8:19 PM

    I *was* conjugating, since you had already taken care of the declining.

    ReplyDelete
  9. gcallah4:51 PM

    Gotcha.

    BTW, I think my nominative singular should have been grafittus.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more