I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Thanks, but I'll stick with a rosary and a good Ron Paul book at the end of the night.
ReplyDeleteOK I'll admit it: I don't get it. Is this clever somehow? I tried saying the words out loud in case it makes you say something naughty, like:
ReplyDeleteEYE
AM
SOFA
KINGDOM
But I detected nothing like that in this meditation.
Well, Bob, I think the idea is that most people do not find it very peaceful to picture every inch of their bodies being covered by a swarm of boll weevils. At least that's how I read the "original intent" of the author.
ReplyDeleteThe page is so wonderful that I want to write something about myself.
ReplyDeleteUnder the help of my friend, I have got a lot of World of Kung fu Gold and the WoKf gold is sold very cheap on a famous website. If you also want to buy World of Kung fu Gold and own plenty of cheap World of Kung fu Gold, you can ask me for help to get the World of Kung fu money.