Martin Feldstein: Houston, We Have A Problem

By -
Feldstein says this could be the worst recession since WWII. I told you so back in October. (That is, after I told you not back in January of 2007.)

Comments

  1. Tim Swanson4:47 AM

    In your piece from a year ago, very few analysts predicted that the credit crunch would be as severe as it is today. Nor did many observers believe that the dollar would lose as much value.

    The reason I mention this is because in your last footnote, you mention a $50 range. However, oil actually surpassed $90USD last year... arguably due to economic "terrorism" in the form of inflation and free loans.

    Still the same, good piece.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy9:52 AM

    Well, what happened is that I had been bewitched by my former employer, and thought that oil prices were coming down. (They were around $60/barrel when I wrote that piece.)

    So if oil prices really did come down, then that would've reduced the trade deficit and pressure on the dollar.

    Also, the people I was arguing with were just saying, "Fiat money bad! Trade deficit bad!" They weren't giving specific reasons for the economy to do poorly at that time.

    Then after I quit my job and delved into the data on my own, I saw things that I hadn't noticed before. In particular, I looked at the Fed's handling of interest rates and realized just how crazy the 2003-2004 period was. So that's when I got scared.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Peter2:17 PM

    And we all know who to blame for it.

    http://www.gopcatholics.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more