Amusing Graph of the Day

By -
Here. (You may not find what the graph indicates to be amusing. But the graph itself certainly is.)

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy9:07 PM

    Yes it is funny, but I'm betting DeLong wouldn't like it if the Heritage Foundation did a chart showing the absolute federal budget deficit under Obama compared to Thomas Jefferson.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah12:43 AM

    He might not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Daniel7:03 AM

    Funny yes... but ARRRGGGH it's from the Urban Institute. They know better than that!!!!

    It's obviously meant to be a punch-line, but they are not in the business of punch-lines, so that's disappointing to see.

    The Tax Policy Center is a joint Urban-Brookings project. I'm just going to pretend that graph came from the Brookings side of the house.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more