Lost History

By -
Aristotle and his students collected extensive (book length) data on the history and structure of the constitutions of 158 Greek city-states. Do you know how many of those we have available today?

One.

The amount of material from the ancient world that we no longer have with us is staggering.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:02 AM

    "So perished that marvelous monument of the literary activity of our ancestors, who had gathered together so many great works of brilliant geniuses." -Orosius on the Destruction of the Great Library of Alexandria

    ReplyDelete
  2. PH12:59 PM

    Worse, survival does not seem to have been closely correlated with merit. Tacitus is by consensus the greatest of the Roman historians, but his greatest masterpiece, the Annals, survives only in two non-overlapping manuscripts, with a massive lacuna in the middle. Meanwhile, the Historia Augusta—aptly described by Livius.org as "something like an ancient mockumentary"—survives nearly entire.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SM12:08 PM

    Do you think that calls into question our abilities to really understand the ancient past considering the amount of history lost?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah4:19 PM

      There's certainly a lot we don't know, but so long as we remember that, we're ok.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more