The Reason Romney Must Go Down

By -
Otherwise, liars like Jennifer Rubin will have won.

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy8:29 PM

    If Romney wins, I think this embassy attack will have had a lot to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21 PM

      That's possible, but I think that it's related to a much broader issue of dominance in the region. I very much believe that a Romney win would have to do with his support from Wall Street and the Israeli lobby. I don't think that Obama wants to pull the trigger against Iran, but I am sure that Romney has no problem doing so. For that alone I wish for Obama to stay in office (in spite of the other problems that I have with him), because I know that the ptb wants a war with Iran and they usually get what they want.

      Of course, I could be wrong, and Obama could be planning to war with Iran after the elections.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more