One-Sidedness

By -
Most famous, false ideas in philosophy and social theory are not completely false, but are one-sided exaggerations of the truth. Take Marx's theory of history, for instance: there is a germ of truth in it, as class struggle often has been an large factor in the course of events, and the material forces of production are important. Where the theory goes wrong is in blowing these truths out of all proportion, and treating them as if they were the only truths about history, as if regional conflict and ethnic clashes and ideological struggles and just plain old personal factors meant nothing or next-to-nothing.

Comments

  1. Prateek11:51 PM

    In my time at CounterPunch and other radical anarchist web-sites (which I don't habitually frequent, I assure you), I have noticed the same thing.

    In the view of anarchists, every thing is a class struggle against capitalists. Everything.

    The Arab Spring? Class struggle against the capitalist overlords of the Arab world!

    (Notwithstanding the participation of wealthy capitalists in overthrowing Mubarak, such as some elite Muslim Brotherhood members).

    The insurgency against the governments in Ecuador and other parts of Latin America? Class struggle of tribals against urban capitalist government rulers!

    (Notwithstanding that Ecuador's prime minister and ruling party are themselves "anti-imperial" self-styled socialists)

    The struggles between Israel and its enemies? Israeli capitalists vs. the Arab worker!

    [Never mind that Hezbollah is run by wealthy capitalists themselves and that Hezbollah has killed Israel soldiers (some of whom are likely working class).]

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more