More chance of percipitation weirdness

By -
Right now The Weather Channel is saying there is a 30% chance of rain at anytime today. It is also saying that at 5pm there is a 50% chance of rain, and then a 40% chance for every hour for the rest of the evening. So rain is far more likely in the last seven hours of the day than it is for the whole 24!

Comments

  1. Lord3:50 PM

    That would be assured by the mean value theorem if the probability is less than 30% for first 17.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah3:52 PM

      No that is not what the percentage for the day is supposed to mean! It is defined as the chance that they'll be rain at ANY point during the day. Thus, it should NEVER be lower than the highest hourly number seen during that day.

      Delete
    2. gcallah4:37 PM

      Also Lord, here is what is a bit annoying about your response: We actually don't need anything as fancy as the mean value theorem; My kids all understood That the average of a series was likely to be under the high-value of the series in about fourth grade.

      So you were faced with two possibilities:

      1) Gene is an absolute idiot who despite having a PhD does not even understand grade school math; or

      2) Perhaps I (Lord) have misunderstood what he's getting at here.

      You always seem to pick 1)

      Delete
    3. gcallah6:51 PM

      Ok, Lord, I was giving you a chance, But with that last comment, You were being a total ass.

      Bye.

      Delete
    4. gcallah6:58 PM

      I know, Lord: Several hundred people a day read this blog. The only one with whom I keep hitting this problem is... YOU. Therefore, I think it is safe to say The problem lies In the reader, Not the writer.

      Delete
  2. Bob Murphy11:56 PM

    Normally Gene I think you exaggerate the problem with these things, but I agree, this one is plain goofy. I can't even come up with what they "meant."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah12:00 AM

      I think the problem is just lazy website updating.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more