Why All Religions Contain Truth

By -
"For the variants, however remote in time, will never sink into a dead past without meaning, once they have arisen from the flow of truth that has 'presence'; they will remain phases in the historical process of living truth of which neither the beginning nor the end is known; and by virtue of this character the truth of each variant is supple­mentary to the truth of the others."-- Eric Voegelin

Comments

  1. Wabulon11:21 PM

    So I can stroll down Shattuck Ave., sacrificing passersby as my God tells me to! I knew it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike B.11:36 PM

    You wascally Wabulon you. It's quite a logical leap from the claim "All religions contain SOME truth" to the claim "Everything contained in each religion is true."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wabulon8:47 PM

    Mike, "It's quite a logical leap from the claim..."--that's all very well if your religion is sadly limited, but my religion sez: "If even one proposition stated in one's religion is true, then the entirety of the religion is true, and not just for the believer in question, but for everyone, everywhere, always.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wabulon8:48 PM

    Mike, "It's quite a logical leap from the claim..."--that's all very well if your religion is sadly limited, but my religion sez: "If even one proposition stated in one's religion is true, then the entirety of the religion is true, and not just for the believer in question, but for everyone, everywhere, always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike B.1:30 AM

      Well that part of your religion isn't true. ;)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more