I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
I would not have won such a contest. I don't live in Brooklyn.
ReplyDeleteNeither did the winner, Bob.
ReplyDeleteMan, that was a low blow. But it makes me wonder just what your web-surfing habits are.
ReplyDeleteWell, at the very least, a small blow.
DeleteHaha! That's funny shit.
DeleteLike I always tell people, Joseph - the fact that Gene's preferences are non-traditional is no reason to make fun of him.
DeleteDude, NSFW.
ReplyDeleteIn the renaissance it *was* considered a good thing to have a small penis. There are numerous nude paintings where the subject is flattered by the small and attenuated appendage. It was thought a small organ went with a more spiritual nature.
ReplyDeleteBob Murphy, renaissance man?