St. Paul and I Agree...
Taxation is not theft: "Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves." -- Romans 13 The key idea implicit here, and the one that turned me on the subject of whether or not taxation is theft, is that "every soul" owes obedience to the "governing authorities." Now, if that is a debt I truly owe , then, when those authorities levy the taxes they need to do the job of governing, I owe them those taxes, and attempts to collect them certainly do not constitute acts of theft. And obviously it doesn't matter at all, from this point of view, whether or not I "signed" any sort of "social contract." (In fact, the history of political thought since the Reformation can be read as an attempt to find a secular rep...
Is that grafitti above your head your calling card?
ReplyDelete"grafitto."
ReplyDeletegrafittum
ReplyDeletegrafitti
grafitto
grafittum
grafitto
grafitta
grafittorum
grafittis
grafitta
grafittis
I think I can see a graffito in the first picture AND a graffito in the picture below.
ReplyDeleteThe Quayle book of rulez sayth: grafittoes
grafitto
ReplyDeletegrafittas
grafittat
grafittamus
grafittatis
grafittant
Oh, and Woody is the only one who got the spelling right.
ReplyDeleteWabulon, you seem to be conjugating grafittus, not declining it!
ReplyDeleteI *was* conjugating, since you had already taken care of the declining.
ReplyDeleteGotcha.
ReplyDeleteBTW, I think my nominative singular should have been grafittus.