Sagging Now = Sagging Knees Later?

By -
I was walking behind a chap doing some serious sagging, not the half-assed style the white boys try, but with his pants' waist at the top of his thighs. Because I was behind him for half a block, I had a chance to notice how bow-legged he had to walk to keep his sag from being ankle height.

My prediction: in forty years, we'll see a spate of knee and hip problems amongst former saggers.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:14 AM

    I completely agree. People don't realize the longterm effects of some of the things they do with their bodies. For example, at the moment, there's basically an epidemic of children and teenagers playing computer/video games for hours and hours a day. This generation will likely have a lot more health problems as they get older in comparison to those of the past generations that actually went outside for fun.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more