In ancapistan, if you have no property, you have no rights
Ancaps often declare, "All rights are property rights." I was thinking about this the other day, in the context of running into libertarians online who insisted that libertarianism supports "the freedom of movement," and realized that this principle actually entails that people without property have no rights at all, let alone any right to "freedom of movement." Of course, immediately, any ancap readers still left here are going to say, "Wait a second! Everyone owns his own body! And so everyone at least has the right to not have his body interfered with." Well, that is true... except that in ancapistan, one has no right to any place to put that body, except if one owns property, or has the permission of at least one property owner to place that body on her land. So, if one is landless and penniless, one had sure better hope that there are kindly disposed property owners aligned in a corridor from wherever one happens to be to wherever the...
I would not have won such a contest. I don't live in Brooklyn.
ReplyDeleteNeither did the winner, Bob.
ReplyDeleteMan, that was a low blow. But it makes me wonder just what your web-surfing habits are.
ReplyDeleteWell, at the very least, a small blow.
DeleteHaha! That's funny shit.
DeleteLike I always tell people, Joseph - the fact that Gene's preferences are non-traditional is no reason to make fun of him.
DeleteDude, NSFW.
ReplyDeleteIn the renaissance it *was* considered a good thing to have a small penis. There are numerous nude paintings where the subject is flattered by the small and attenuated appendage. It was thought a small organ went with a more spiritual nature.
ReplyDeleteBob Murphy, renaissance man?