The Delegate Strategy

By -
In Virginia, the state where Ron Paul did his very best in the popular vote, Romney won the delegate race 43 to 3. These are pledged delegates.

Only a handful of states permit the kind of manipulation at the district level that is allowing Paul to greatly exceed his popular vote totals in some places. The Paul campaign itself has said it hopes to pick up six states this way, none of them very large.

So that leaves him getting whomped in delegate count in 44 other states, by totals similar to the above. (For instance, in California, a winner-take-all state, he will lose 172-0.)

I will bet anyone who wants even money that Paul will lose to Romney by at least 500 delegates. Any takers? Say, for a thousand?

Comments

  1. Anonymous7:56 AM

    Hey, did you just cut Murph out of the action? LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah9:43 AM

      I'll give him the vigorish if anyone takes me up on this.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:12 AM

      Hey, I just learned something new and the day has just barely begun. All this time I never realized that "vig" was short for "vigorish". Thanks, Gene.

      Delete
  2. SamuelVanderwaal3:20 AM

    Nope. I think I'll keep my money and dignity. As much as I'd like to see a different outcome I think you are correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah3:49 AM

      Yes, Samuel, it has nothing to do with liking Ron Paul or not! As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I love my daughter much more than Michael Phelps, but if she goes to race him in the 100 free, I'm putting all of my money on him.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more