Liveblogging Wood: The Ideological American Revolution

By -
"And certainly ideology, it used to be thought, could not have been involved in that most practical of revolutions -- the American Revolution.

"Few historians of the Revolution believe that anymore. It now seems clear that the Revolution was very much an ideological movement... In fact, I would go so far as to say that the American Revolution was as ideological as any revolution in modern Western history..." -- The Idea of America, p. 321

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:02 PM

    I wasn't aware that anybody thought that the AR wasn't ideologically driven. I mean, the concept of revolution is almost synonymous with ideology, in my mind. Well, a change of ideology, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah2:15 PM

    "I mean, the concept of revolution is almost synonymous with ideology, in my mind."

    Only revolutions since the 17th century can really be characterized that way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:16 AM

    Well, I am not too knowledgeable of history before the 17th century, being more read on American history. So, what were the causes of revolutions before that period? Religion, I am guessing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah5:23 AM

      Religion would only be a big factor starting in the 16th-century; mostly, group X was in charge and group Y wanted to take over, or something of the sort.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more