Broken Windows, Shattered Windows, Dressed in Holiday Style

By -
Sweet are the uses of adversity,
Which, like the toad, ugly and venomous,
Wears yet a precious jewel in his head;
And this our life, exempt from public haunt,
Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in every thing. -- As You Like It


(Hat tip Patrick Sullivan.)

Comments

  1. Jim1:37 PM

    Here's an interesting thought experiment. Per Murphyists, there is no way that the process of disaster-plus-recovery can lead to a net positive gain in wealth relative to a counterfactual world in which the disaster never happened.

    So, let's say there were never any calamity that visited the world. Nobody's window ever broke; nobody's power ever went out in a storm; fire never devastated a city nor bombing a nation's industrial plant. How much richer would the world be, right now?

    Would it be richer? Would all of the technological innovations we enjoy have still happened, and maybe more besides? Would we have developed all of our tricks for using resources? All of the elaboration of social arrangements? Is destruction only ever "creative" when it takes place via the cash nexus? Is it even possible to imagine an arc of human progress that is not bound up with response to catastrophes large and small?

    I suspect that disaster is overrated as a driver of human progress - the Apollo program wasn't a response to a genuine cataclysm, just a political one e.g. And sometimes disasters seem merely destructive. (Minos, anyone?) But has every broken window or earthquake represented only a net loss in the long term - even medium term - wealth of the world?

    I realize this is unanswerable. But I think it's actually so difficult to conceive the counterfactual that we have to wonder if "adversity" is even exogenous enough to human striving to consider separately from it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more