Today's Students...

By -
are rather courteous, or so it seems to me. For instance, they regularly hold the door for people (of either sex), or, when they are getting off of the school shuttle bus, they thank the driver. I do not recall my cohort being as courteous as students.

Comments

  1. Jonathan Finegold Catalán3:52 PM

    This might be more usual, but during our Tuesday lecture for our grad International Monetary Theory class the professor called on me to interpret something. Unfortunately, I spent 30 seconds looking like an idiot, because I didn't want to come out and say that I wasn't paying attention. I ended up saying that, and after class I apologized for my professor for being rude.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Prateek11:22 PM

    David Brooks had a column about this - that the troublemaking and delinquent generation is far off in the past, and today, the youth are simply much more restrained.

    It was more typical in the old days for the boys to be more defiant, more aggressive, and more violent. As more women show up in the teaching staff and among the students, the atmosphere feminized a bit and even the boys became like that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more