Stravinsky on Mussolini

By -
"I don't believe that anyone venerates Mussolini more than I ... I know many exalted personages, and my artist's mind does not shrink from political and social issues. Well, after having seen so many events and so many more or less representative men, I have an overpowering urge to render homage to your Duce. He is the saviour of Italy and – let us hope – Europe." -- Igor Stravinsky, 1930

And what had Mussolini saved Italy from, per Stravinsky? Bolshevism.

I note this not to condemn Stravinsky, but to put Mises's remarks on Il Duce in context (once more). Many, many people had good things to say about Mussolini in the late 20s and early 30s. Mises had lots of company!

Comments

  1. Prateek11:06 AM

    "Mises had lots of company!"

    Churchill and Gandhi included.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:50 PM

    http://archive.mises.org/18257/mises-on-fascism-again/

    http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1989/jun/15/jews-and-geniuses-an-exchange/

    Perspective helps.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ken B1:50 PM

    "You're Mussolini" were part of the origianl lyrics to You're the Top

    As was "You're cellophane" then a new new thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more