Practical Applications of Social Models

By -
Well, the Prisoner's Dilemma is certainly a useful arrow to have in one's quiver: I once had two students whom I knew had cheated on a test, but without any decisive proof. So I called one of them in alone to my office, implied he was the less guilty party, and offered a reduced penalty for a confession.

Man, it took the guy about two seconds to choose "defect."

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy2:44 AM

    This has nothing to do with me venting about the Krugman post: Are you sure this is a good thing for you to do? When the police offer a plea bargain, I think that is horrible. It is coercing a confession. Suppose this kid were actually innocent, and you're telling him to confess and get a lighter punishment. What is the point of doing that? If you are already know he's guilty, why do you need a confession? If you don't know he's guilty, why is getting one under threat of a (marginally higher) punishment legit?

    I'm not asking as a shocked, shocked libertarian nutjob or something, I'm asking you just to explain why you did it. E.g. if you say, "Well when he confessed, I could read his body language etc. and tell that he wasn't making it up. It really did confirm my hunch," that's all I'm looking for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah9:45 AM

      It was statistically obvious they had cheated (sat next to each other, got the exact same grade, same wrong answers), but without having actually seen them I wasn't sure if I could "get a conviction."

      And yes, the student's reaction was of someone who felt very guilty over what they had done, not someone who was being arm twisted into confessing.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more