Earth at Night

By -
Pretty neat. I think it makes those "carbon footprint" figures more understandable. This picture was obviously taken during a solar eclipse...

Comments

  1. Anonymous9:53 AM

    She's a beauty...

    However, there was no solar eclipse on 11 August 2002, the date on the image. Also, no eclipse ever casts shadow on the entire earth at once.

    Think digital compositing...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:02 PM

    Since I am still trying to understand the nuances of various money supply numbers, I have not been able to take on an entire study of climatology, as it appears the rest of the world has done, given the strong conclusions most have reached about the carbon "problem".

    However, I did find this interesting, ahem, empirical data about carbon levels:

    "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years. On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"

    --Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and Professor of Geology at Carleton University in Canada

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm

    Pretty map though showing the superior progress made by relatively free countries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy5:53 PM

    However, there was no solar eclipse on 11 August 2002, the date on the image. Also, no eclipse ever casts shadow on the entire earth at once.

    I thought someone might also point out that the earth is a sphere, so taking a picture like this would be difficult.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more