I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Trees have experience -- the tree knew it fell.
ReplyDeleteYes, the town will be alerting you to the fact if you don't clean it up. Your proof will be the fine they impose on you.
ReplyDeletePepe,
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty secluded. I think one of my neighbors would have to tattle on us.
Like Putin, I understand that leaving the tree back there indefinitely could upset the strategic balance of the neighborhood.