Foreign-language speakers under every rock

By -
I learned, from Benny the Irish polyglot, that one can find speakers of most languages in most places if one just keeps looking. Based on that tip, look I did. I now have at least eight native or very fluent speakers of Italian who I see between once and four times per week. This means that every day I am able to converse in Italian with someone who knows the language much better than I do.

Benny was right.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:50 PM

    Great! That's the best way to truly learn a language.

    I picked up a ton of Spanish just from being around Spanish-speaking people while living is SoCal, and I wasn't even trying to learn the language, nor was I really aware that it was happening.

    As it is today, I can often understand conversations in the language, but I can't speak, read, or write it. This is what sparked my relatively recent interest in linguistics, because while I can't translate particular words, I can often get the general meaning of a sentence or phrase just from hearing it, and I found this to be truly bizarre (so I obviously had try to find a way to explain it).

    There are many reasons that I wish that I was still in SoCal, but one of them is the simple fact that I am no longer around very many Spanish-speaking people, thus my ability to understand it is diminishing. I think that if I had stuck around, that I probably would have eventually become fluent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:15 PM

    I enjoy the Internet polyglot community. I prefer Steve Kaufman's method though. Where do you stand on Benny's "speak from day one" approach as a whole?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more