Why Is Google Translate Obsessed with the Second Person Plural?

By -
Translating second-person statements in English into a Romance language is doubtlessly difficult: standard English has only one second person form for formal and informal singular and plural uses of the second person. (Non-standard forms sometimes have a second person plural: "y'all" and "youse" being famous examples.)

But Google translate seems to render every single second-person English sentence into Italian as a request for that sentence in second-person plural. Every single time. What the heck is up with that? Surely, in almost any language, when we address "you," we address a single "you" far more often the we address a multitude. So why does Google always default to the plural you in translating English sentences into Italian? (I don't know if it does this from English into other Romance languages as well: perhaps someone could check?)

Comments

  1. shonk10:02 PM

    Doesn't seem to happen when translating the four sentences I tried to Spanish.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Andy11:03 PM

    In French, second person plural is the same as second person singular, formal. Is it the same in Italian?

    And yes, that's the form Google translates "you" into in French.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah2:16 PM

      No, they are different in Italian:

      Ha -- you have f. s.
      Avete -- you have p.

      Parla -- you talk f. s.
      Parlate -- you talk p.

      Delete
  3. Andy4:50 PM

    If find it really interesting that we did recently have the other pronouns equivalent to French:

    "Thou," 2nd person singular subject informal, equivalent to "tu."
    "Thee," 2nd person singular object informal, equivalent to "toi."
    "You," 2nd person singular formal, or plural, subject or object, all four of which are also a single pronoun in French: "vous."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:28 PM

    I think "Ye" would be the plural complement to "You", if "Thou" is to "Thee".

    Google translate always has problems. If doesn't even do that good of a job with Latin, and that's a 'dead' language!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andy3:51 PM

    Oh yes, forgot "ye."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mark Jaroski12:58 AM

    For what it's worth it does work, but you have to use the second person singular conjugations in English: http://ur1.ca/35dqa

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mark Jaroski1:00 AM

    The second person translations do work, but sometimes it takes me a while to come up with the English conjugation. Here's an example: http://ur1.ca/35dqa

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mark Jaroski1:02 AM

    Wow. I just realized that the en->fr translator understands "thou complainest", but the en->it translator doesn't.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Unknown5:23 PM

    Pity. My need is to translate into Italian using the 2nd person formal, but i only get 2nd person singular. “Thee/thou” was a great idea.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more