Government Takes Kid Away for Drinking Hard Lemonade

By -
This stuff is really getting ridiculous. (And by the way, I am aware that there was plenty of crazy cr*p going on with the FLDS sect, aided by local government.) This professor took his kid to a baseball game, ordered a "lemonade," and let his kid drink Mike's Hard Lemonade because he says he didn't know it was alcoholic.

A security guard saw it, and next thing you know the kid is in foster care for two days. The dad wasn't allowed to return home for a week. HT2LRC.

As always, what's truly sickening is how many of the posters at the story above support the action. I.e. this guy had it coming, letting his kid drink Hard Lemonade! Serves him right.

Comments

  1. gcallah12:16 PM

    What is so strange is that many of the supporters of the govs actions probably consider themselves to be "conservatives," and yet allowing minors some alcohol is the custom in all traditional societies that drink alcohol, as far as I know, and the recent frenzy about this is entirely a "progressive" phenomenon. Today's "conservatives" are, in terms of their historical knowledge, children -- they also mostly don't seem to be aware that professional police forces, one of their favorite government projects, are a recent, progressive phenomenon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:23 PM

    Yeah Gene, today's conservatives are always yesterday's progressives.

    “It only takes 20 years for a liberal to become a conservative without changing a single idea.” - Robert Anton Wilson

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah11:19 AM

    Just read the story and... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! They took the kid, IN AN AMBULANCE, to the hospital! Because he drank the equivalent of ONE BEER.

    When I was growing up, it was absolutely conventional to let kids have, say, a glass of wine on holidays and so on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah11:55 AM

    "let his kid drink Mike's Hard Lemonade because he says he didn't know it was alcoholic."

    My wife lets me have Mike's because she doesn't know I'm alcoholic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more