They're Finally Admitting Who's Da Best!

By -

Comments

  1. Anonymous8:22 AM

    Justice had to be done someday.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:03 AM

    I want to add something:

    I appreciate the work you guys do here, and even if I disagree with you; it's serious disagreement. It's not like disagreeing with typical newspaper columnists or the like. In that case, I usually dismiss them as idiots, and am confirmed right to a statistical correlation of nearly 1:1...

    Take the self-ownership discussion, for example; it pushed me (and might continue to push) to seriously think about the roots of my position, and their implications. That's not a daily thing for me.

    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:14 AM

    Actually, I am very disappointed in your sparse covergae of "...secret sex tips gleaned from years spent with various Himalayan masters."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy10:35 AM

    Sidney,

    You are not the first to bring that up. Gene apparently engaged in shameless bait-and-switch in this internet age. I'm surprised he didn't name this site, "Austrians Gone Wild!!"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wabulon8:02 PM

    Sorry. They attempted to domesticate the honoree by writing the name in ways its readers might reasonably be expected to understand. The correct spelling is "Krsh Landing" with little dots under several of the letters, and refers, of course, to the Hindu Vedas.

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah1:06 PM

    "I appreciate the work you guys do here, and even if I disagree with you; it's serious disagreement"

    Thanks, Brian!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more