A Site-Specific Search Engine

By -
Has anyone EVER found what he or she was looking for using a search engine on a specific site? E.g. if you want to find out a list of apple prices from 1980 onward, don't you dare search for "apple prices" at the BLS website. And just now I was trying to find the academic homepage of Robert Balling, a climate scientist at Arizona State University. I tried at first to go through the hoops of "Academics" and then different departments, but that wasn't working. In desperation I tried searching the site for "balling." Ha ha why would that work?

In all honesty, has anyone EVER found the desired information using a site-specific engine? I think I'm about 0 for 50 in such searches. I usually don't even bother anymore.

Comments

  1. gcallah10:59 PM

    Yeah, I tried putting one up here and it found NOTHING, so I took it back down.

    ReplyDelete
  2. John Goes11:33 PM

    Google Search "THING YOU WANT TO SEARCH site:www.gene-callahan.org"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:40 AM

    Has anyone EVER found what he or she was looking for using a search engine on a specific site?

    Um, yes. Any more stupid questions?

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah1:55 AM

    Hey, I'm guessing, but by the "manners" test, I'd bet this is the same anusymous as in the Wilson thread.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:11 AM

    Gene,

    Yeah, I tried putting one up here and it found NOTHING...

    This may be a deeper comment than you realize.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bob Murphy8:52 AM

    I should have clarified that I realize you can get Google to do it. I'm talking about a site-specific search engine, not a site-specific search. See?

    ReplyDelete
  7. gcallah12:58 PM

    Sidney, at least you come around and mock me in a witty manner, rather than just going for raw insult volume like last night's visitor.

    But something keeps you comin' back for more of our nothin'!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:36 PM

    Gene,

    I come back for your mad dog attacks on the LRC crew. Quite entertaining (sometimes accuarte).

    Hey, I hear that Callahan writes there occasionally and this really needs to be chewed up:

    http://www.gene-callahan.org/blog/2008/04/quick-critique-of-gary-north.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:11 PM

    Whoops, that's supposed to be "I hear Murphy writes there....

    You Irishmen all sound alike, anyway.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more