I'm loosing my mind!

By -
Has anyone else noticed that people are loosing track of how to spell "losing"? I see "loosing" more and more often these days. Yesterday, I discovered it in a novel I'm reading: "He was loosing his integrity."

What happened? There may be some general decline in educational standards, but why is this particular word loosing its correct spelling so fast? And just how would these people spell it if they were, say, "loosing the animals from their cages"?

Comments

  1. Lord4:37 PM

    I always wonder if they mean loosening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Scott1:23 PM

    I make this error a lot. But I usually catch it. I think it is an artifact of typing, because I do not think I would write it out longhand.

    The error that always gets me is using the word 'loan' as a verb. Have people forgotten 'lend' and 'lent'?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Greg Pandatshang9:53 AM

    It's because of the interaction of two factors: 1) the pronunciation of "o" in "lose" is irregular: the regular spelling would be "oo"; and 2) the word "loose" does exist, so it doesn't strike the eye as sore-thumb wrong.

    I occasionally get confused by lead/led/read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:37 AM

      To my eye, the double 'o' almost demands an 's' sound after it, not a 'z' sound:

      'Moose': pronounced 'mús'
      'Mose' (if it existed): pronounced 'móz'

      Delete
    2. gcallah10:37 AM

      In any case, my big question is 'why now?' I never saw this 30 years ago.

      Delete
    3. rob6:13 PM

      This reminded me of an excellent English teacher I had 30+ years ago. He used to complain of this very same deterioration. Perhaps there is more ruin in a language that you think !

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more