Paul Got Da Bump...

By -
I was looking for in South Carolina -- his excellent showing in New Hampshire lifted him about 3 or 4% in the SC polls. Here's is what to watch for next: can he secure third place ahead of Santorum? (They are now running neck-and-neck.) If he does that, he'll be in great shape to go to the GOP convention with a boatload of delegates, which he can use to influence the party platform.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:06 AM

    Gene, I was just curious about something. Of course, we all know that you are no longer a libertarian and that your economics is no longer what can be described as purely Austrian (though, I sense a great amount of Austrian influence still present), but you still have been rather kind to Ron Paul.

    Your comments regarding the newsletters was pretty good and I agreed for the most part, and you seem to support his stance on foreign policy. So, I must ask, what are some of the things that you like about Ron Paul?

    This is a little off-topic, but regarding your move away from libertarianism, I feel that you are often unfairly criticized for this. If it is any consolation, even though we may disagree on certain topics, I still think you're alright and I also think that you're pretty darned good when it comes to philosophy. Which brings up another question: why did you pursue a career as an economist if your heart seems to lie in philosophy?

    Sorry to ask that on this post, but it's something that has been on my mind for a while and I haven't found a good place to bring it up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah7:46 AM

    "Which brings up another question: why did you pursue a career as an economist if your heart seems to lie in philosophy?"

    But Joseph, I have not pursued a career as an economist: it has pursued me! (Seriously, I am teaching economics right now as that is the job that opened up.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah7:47 AM

    Oh, and thanks for your kind words.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:14 AM

    Hey, no problem, Gene. I am a pretty open-minded guy, and I can easily tell when somebody is being vilified just because he is no longer part of the club. Personally, I am a man who believes in never burning bridges over such trivial matters.

    On my question:
    I guess I should have phrased that differently. I should have asked why you pursued an education in economics if philosophy was your true passion?

    If I were to guess, I would say that it is because economics is probably the closest thing to philosophy in which there is a greater prospect of getting work. Plus, from a philosophical point of view, economics is pretty darned interesting-- there is plenty of philosophical content in economics.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In ancapistan, if you have no property, you have no rights

By -
Ancaps often declare, "All rights are property rights." I was thinking about this the other day, in the context of running into libertarians online who insisted that libertarianism supports "the freedom of movement," and realized that this principle actually entails that people without property have no rights at all, let alone any right to "freedom of movement." Of course, immediately, any ancap readers still left here are going to say, "Wait a second! Everyone owns his own body! And so everyone at least has the right to not have his body interfered with." Well, that is true... except that in ancapistan, one has no right to any place to put that body, except if one owns property, or has the permission of at least one property owner to place that body on her land. So, if one is landless and penniless, one had sure better hope that there are kindly disposed property owners aligned in a corridor from wherever one happens to be to wherever the...
Read more

St. Paul and I Agree...

By -
Taxation is not theft: "Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves." -- Romans 13 The key idea implicit here, and the one that turned me on the subject of whether or not taxation is theft, is that "every soul" owes obedience to the "governing authorities." Now, if that is a debt I truly owe , then, when those authorities levy the taxes they need to do the job of governing, I owe them those taxes, and attempts to collect them certainly do not constitute acts of theft. And obviously it doesn't matter at all, from this point of view, whether or not I "signed" any sort of "social contract." (In fact, the history of political thought since the Reformation can be read as an attempt to find a secular rep...
Read more

Libertarianism and Violence, II

By -
I decided to move some discussion from this post up to the top level here. Specifically, Watoosh wrote: "Well, if violence is defined as initiation of force (which, of course, presupposes certain property rights), then I think Rockwell is correct..." Well, if we define cats as elephants, then many people keep elephants in their house. More seriously, firstly, violence is not usually defined that way. It's defined as, you know, violence, so that, say, someone may respond violently or non-violently to someone who aggresses against them. Otherwise, it would make no sense to say, for instance, "He punched me, but I did not stoop to violence in response." And, secondly, the libertarian usage of "initiation of force" is very offbeat. If I wander onto someone's meadow, most people would not say I had "initiated force" -- I mean, sure, I used "force" against the earth to push off walking, but that's not force directed against...
Read more