I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Florence.
ReplyDeletehttp://bit.ly/zmmp9m
Rob, right province, but wrong city.
ReplyDeleteSiena then.
ReplyDeleteAha! Siena? That looks like the 'Torro del Mangia' in the background, but it is hard to tell. The white top on the clock tower is a dead giveaway, though.
ReplyDeleteJoseph wins the cigar!
ReplyDeleteA Cohiba Espléndido (Churchill), if you please.
ReplyDeleteRob, you get a cigar as well.
ReplyDelete