Sentences Written in the Absence of Thought

By -
Will not be understood: I bought a train ticket today and happened to look at the fine print. I was struck by the following: "Fares paid in the absence of a ticket will not be refunded."

I *think* what they mean is, "If you lost your ticket, you can't get no refund." But instead of just saying what they meant, they decided to write in bureaucratese.

Comments

  1. Anonymous1:46 PM

    What's up with the double negative, Gene? Or, was that deliberate?

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah2:01 PM

    It certainly was. Here is another writer of English who saw nothing wrong with double negatives:

    "nor your name is not Master Cesario; nor this is not my nose neither. Nothing that is so is so."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:10 PM

      I have no problem with double negatives in the English language, as I am certainly not a pedant. Also, having dug into linguistics a bit over this past year, I do find certain word combinations interesting (while many people would think they are incorrect). In any case, the double negative that you provide actually makes it look like refunds are given to those who lose their ticket. In fact, it pretty much makes it look like a refund is a mandatory if you lose your ticket. That's what I was noticing.

      Obviously, you were being humorous... and I think that what I noticed was your actual intent. So, I guess what I should really be saying is "ha" and, um... "ha". LOL

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more