Why Caplan Doesn't Care About How Many Illegal Immigrants Enter the Country

By -
He explains it:
Indeed, I've wanted to live in a Bubble for as long as I can remember. Since childhood, I've struggled to psychologically and socially wall myself off from "my" society. At 40, I can fairly say, "Mission accomplished."

Why put so much distance between myself and the outside world? Because despite my legendary optimism, I find my society unacceptable. It is dreary, insipid, ugly, boring, wrong, and wicked.
 Of course, if the society you live in is "dreary, insipid, ugly, boring, wrong, and wicked," then what the hell? If it is taken over by Klingons, it can't get any worse, and it just might get better.

Comments

  1. Cody9:24 PM

    Libertarianism offers the socially awkward an escape from the seemingly innumerable obligations "society" entails.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy9:50 PM

    If it is taken over by Klingons...

    That's the most racist thing you've ever written, Gene.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Otto Kerner7:08 PM

    I quite disagree with both of you. The society we live is dreary, insipid, ugly, and boring, and arguably wrong and wicked. It could most certainly be a lot worse, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BZ1:59 AM

    Probably explains why he has the insane beliefs that he does and why his book covers are so tone deaf/narcissistic. After all, if America as a nation goes down the gutter due to his beliefs being imposed upon Americans, then so what? It's society was "dreary, insipid, ugly, boring, wrong, and wicked" so it got what it deserved. Calling American society "dreary, insipid, ugly, boring, wrong, and wicked" is like calling a jumbo jet slow because it can't fly at mach 100. I agree it's not perfect and it could use lots of work but to ignore the relative difference between it and other societies is just plane ignorance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more