What If Airplane Had Starred Liam Neeson?

By -
I asked someone for a light today. He replied, "Surely."

I said, "Please don't call me Shirley."

He said, "Sorry, sure."

"No, no, I'm just making an Airplane joke!"

"Oh, Airplane, with Liam Neeson!"

Which immediately led me to think, what if Airplane had really starred Liam Neeson instead of Leslie Nielsen? We would have dialogue like:

Neeson: This woman has to be gotten to a hospital

Elaine Dickinson: A hospital? What is it?

Neeson: Ah, it's a big feckin' building with lots of sick people. It's awful, innit, all the sick and dying in the world? But what are we to do, hey, just soldier on then, right?"

Would have been a bit of a different movie, I suspect.

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy1:04 PM

    Hey, Liam Neeson is a funny guy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. kevin quinn1:23 PM

    Hah! That reminds me: years ago on an e-mail list serve, people were discussing the civil rights movement and someone wrote, "who can forget the heroism of Rosa Luxemburg, who refused to give up her seat on the bus." That prompted me to write something about the neglect of the role of Germans and Austrians in the civil rights movement. Stuff like Sigmund Freud's "I Have An Interpretation of Your Dream" speech.

    ReplyDelete
  3. kevin quinn1:24 PM

    Hah! That reminds me: years ago on an e-mail list serve, people were discussing the civil rights movement and someone wrote, "who can forget the heroism of Rosa Luxemburg, who refused to give up her seat on the bus." That prompted me to write something about the neglect of the role of Germans and Austrians in the civil rights movement. Stuff like Sigmund Freud's "I Have An Interpretation of Your Dream" speech.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more