Does This Make Any Sense to Anybody?

By -
The NYU Development Research Institute has just "refuted" the idea that America is in decline by noting that, in the past, America was not in decline!

So, if my doctor tells me, "You have just contracted a deadly disease," I can refute him by pointing to my previous 53 years of health?! (And by the way, I am not contending that America is in decline. I'm just noting that the graph shown is a ridiculous refutation of the idea that it is.)

Comments

  1. PH4:20 PM

    In fairness, any time someone says that something "is" happening, what he really means is that it has been happening and is likely to continue. The question about how far back to look is just a pragmatic one. (I'm not denying that the present has temporal duration; it's just that it's too brief to register in our thoughts about social change.)

    The Institute's argument makes some sense to me if they're referring to the popular sentiment that the American economy has stagnated since the 1970s. Otherwise, your critique is spot-on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah9:24 AM

      Yes, if my doctor told me "You have been very ill for the past 40 years," I would walk out.

      But clearly there is a decline recently in the graph they use. So someone who wants to say "America has been in decline since 2009" would use that graph as evidence, not counter-evidence.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more