Just Keeping You Up-to-Date on the Sprint to the Finish Line

By -
Since my last post on the GOP nomination "battle," the delegate tally is:

Romney: 190
Paul: 13

Romney is now ahead of Paul in delegate count 1169 to 118. Paul just lost his home state to Romney by over 800,000 votes, out of 1.4 million cast.

I really don't keep posting these to rub it in. I would have loved to see Paul beat Romney: I don't agree with Paul on everything, but Romney is bloody awful. Instead, I am urging those who kept saying that "Paul has a very good shot at the nomination," or "It is treason to [state the plain fact that] Paul has no shot" to ask yourself: What the f&*k was I thinking? Because somehow, your thoughts here had become utterly disconnected from reality.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more